Close Menu

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    What's Hot

    Laptop Buying Guide (2025): How to Choose the Right PC (Step-by-Step Guide)

    June 16, 2025

    Spiraling with ChatGPT | TechCrunch

    June 16, 2025

    How Covid-19 Changed Hideo Kojima’s Vision for ‘Death Stranding 2’

    June 15, 2025
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    AI News First
    Trending
    • Laptop Buying Guide (2025): How to Choose the Right PC (Step-by-Step Guide)
    • Spiraling with ChatGPT | TechCrunch
    • How Covid-19 Changed Hideo Kojima’s Vision for ‘Death Stranding 2’
    • What Is A Postgraduate Degree?
    • The AI execution gap: Why 80% of projects don’t reach production
    • Specs get 2026 upgrade to rival Meta
    • The Mysterious Inner Workings of Io, Jupiter’s Volcanic Moon
    • Nolah Evolution Hybrid Mattress Review: A Jack of All Trades
    • Home
    • AI News
    • AI Apps

      What Is A Postgraduate Degree?

      June 15, 2025

      What is Answer Engine Optimization (AEO)

      June 15, 2025

      Types of Project Management: Methodologies and Examples

      June 14, 2025

      40+ Quality Assurance Manager Interview Questions and Answers

      June 13, 2025

      Highest Paying Data Science Jobs

      June 12, 2025
    • Tech News
    • AI Smart Tech
    AI News First
    Home » The AI execution gap: Why 80% of projects don’t reach production
    AI News 0

    The AI execution gap: Why 80% of projects don’t reach production

    0June 15, 2025
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    Enterprise artificial intelligence investment is unprecedented, with IDC projecting global spending on AI and GenAI to double to $631 billion by 2028. Yet beneath the impressive budget allocations and boardroom enthusiasm lies a troubling reality: most organisations struggle to translate their AI ambitions into operational success.

    The sobering statistics behind AI’s promise

    ModelOp’s 2025 AI Governance Benchmark Report, based on input from 100 senior AI and data leaders at Fortune 500 enterprises, reveals a disconnect between aspiration and execution.

    While more than 80% of enterprises have 51 or more generative AI projects in proposal phases, only 18% have successfully deployed more than 20 models into production.

    The execution gap represents one of the most significant challenges facing enterprise AI today. Most generative AI projects still require 6 to 18 months to go live – if they reach production at all.

    The result is delayed returns on investment, frustrated stakeholders, and diminished confidence in AI initiatives in the enterprise.

    The cause: Structural, not technical barriers

    The biggest obstacles preventing AI scalability aren’t technical limitations – they’re structural inefficiencies plaguing enterprise operations. The ModelOp benchmark report identifies several problems that create what experts call a “time-to-market quagmire.”

    Fragmented systems plague implementation. 58% of organisations cite fragmented systems as the top obstacle to adopting governance platforms. Fragmentation creates silos where different departments use incompatible tools and processes, making it nearly impossible to maintain consistent oversight in AI initiatives.

    Manual processes dominate despite digital transformation. 55% of enterprises still rely on manual processes – including spreadsheets and email – to manage AI use case intake. The reliance on antiquated methods creates bottlenecks, increases the likelihood of errors, and makes it difficult to scale AI operations.

    Lack of standardisation hampers progress. Only 23% of organisations implement standardised intake, development, and model management processes. Without these elements, each AI project becomes a unique challenge requiring custom solutions and extensive coordination by multiple teams.

    Enterprise-level oversight remains rare Just 14% of companies perform AI assurance at the enterprise level, increasing the risk of duplicated efforts and inconsistent oversight. The lack of centralised governance means organisations often discover they’re solving the same problems multiple times in different departments.

    The governance revolution: From obstacle to accelerator

    A change is taking place in how enterprises view AI governance. Rather than seeing it as a compliance burden that slows innovation, forward-thinking organisations recognise governance as an important enabler of scale and speed.

    Leadership alignment signals strategic shift. The ModelOp benchmark data reveals a change in organisational structure: 46% of companies now assign accountability for AI governance to a Chief Innovation Officer – more than four times the number who place accountability under Legal or Compliance. This strategic repositioning reflects a new understanding that governance isn’t solely about risk management, but can enable innovation.

    Investment follows strategic priority. A financial commitment to AI governance underscores its importance. According to the report, 36% of enterprises have budgeted at least $1 million annually for AI governance software, while 54% have allocated resources specifically for AI Portfolio Intelligence to track value and ROI.

    What high-performing organisations do differently

    The enterprises that successfully bridge the ‘execution gap’ share several characteristics in their approach to AI implementation:

    Standardised processes from day one. Leading organisations implement standardised intake, development, and model review processes in AI initiatives. Consistency eliminates the need to reinvent workflows for each project and ensures that all stakeholders understand their responsibilities.

    Centralised documentation and inventory. Rather than allowing AI assets to proliferate in disconnected systems, successful enterprises maintain centralised inventories that provide visibility into every model’s status, performance, and compliance posture.

    Automated governance checkpoints. High-performing organisations embed automated governance checkpoints throughout the AI lifecycle, helping ensure compliance requirements and risk assessments are addressed systematically rather than as afterthoughts.

    End-to-end traceability. Leading enterprises maintain complete traceability of their AI models, including data sources, training methods, validation results, and performance metrics.

    Measurable impact of structured governance

    The benefits of implementing comprehensive AI governance extend beyond compliance. Organisations that adopt lifecycle automation platforms reportedly see dramatic improvements in operational efficiency and business outcomes.

    A financial services firm profiled in the ModelOp report experienced a halving of time to production and an 80% reduction in issue resolution time after implementing automated governance processes. Such improvements translate directly into faster time-to-value and increased confidence among business stakeholders.

    Enterprises with robust governance frameworks report the ability to many times more models simultaneously while maintaining oversight and control. This scalability lets organisations pursue AI initiatives in multiple business units without overwhelming their operational capabilities.

    The path forward: From stuck to scaled

    The message from industry leaders that the gap between AI ambition and execution is solvable, but it requires a shift in approach. Rather than treating governance as a necessary evil, enterprises should realise it enables AI innovation at scale.

    Immediate action items for AI leaders

    Organisations looking to escape the ‘time-to-market quagmire’ should prioritise the following:

    • Audit current state: Conduct an assessment of existing AI initiatives, identifying fragmented processes and manual bottlenecks
    • Standardise workflows: Implement consistent processes for AI use case intake, development, and deployment in all business units
    • Invest in integration: Deploy platforms to unify disparate tools and systems under a single governance framework
    • Establish enterprise oversight: Create centralised visibility into all AI initiatives with real-time monitoring and reporting abilities

    The competitive advantage of getting it right

    Organisations that can solve the execution challenge will be able to bring AI solutions to market faster, scale more efficiently, and maintain the trust of stakeholders and regulators.

    Enterprises that continue with fragmented processes and manual workflows will find themselves disadvantaged compared to their more organised competitors. Operational excellence isn’t about efficiency but survival.

    The data shows enterprise AI investment will continue to grow. Therefore, the question isn’t whether organisations will invest in AI, but whether they’ll develop the operational abilities necessary to realise return on investment. The opportunity to lead in the AI-driven economy has never been greater for those willing to embrace governance as an enabler not an obstacle.

    (Image source: Unsplash)

    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

    Related Posts

    Spiraling with ChatGPT | TechCrunch

    June 16, 2025

    Google reportedly plans to cut ties with Scale AI

    June 15, 2025

    NVIDIA helps Germany lead Europe’s AI manufacturing race

    June 14, 2025
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Editors Picks
    Top Reviews
    Advertisement
    Demo
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest Vimeo YouTube
    • Home
    • Privacy Policy
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Disclaimer
    © 2025 AI News First

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.